|
INSTRUMENT
STERILIZATION IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY
Laparoscopic
surgery required expensive surgical instruments that are
inherently difficult t clean. Steam sterilization in an
autoclave is not possible for many instruments and Ethylene
oxide sterilization is either unavailable or unsuitable
between operations in many instances. The commonest method
seems to be the use of prolonged exposure to Formaldehyde
gas in a chamber or immersion in Glutataldehyde. A review
of the literature regarding this is presented.
On
study (1) on cleaned and sterilized instruments has shown
residual organic debris on 87% of instruments that were
considered clean. This was done on reusable laproscopic,
reused disposable laparoscopic and conventional surgical
instruments. Interestingly the amount of residue found on
reusable laparoscopic and reused disposable laparoscopic
instruments was similar. Following washing and ultrasonic
cleaning one study (2) demonstrated bacterial growth of
>100 Colony Forming Units (CFU) that disassembly of instruments
before cleaning following by re-assembly leads to more tough
sterilization than when the instruments are not dis-assembled.
It
is recommended that certain laparoscopic instruments (such
as optics that cannot be sterilized in an autoclave should
receive a high level of disinfection (4). Decontamination
of instruments should be done immediately after surgery
by thorough washing and the use of an ultrasonic cleaner
(5). The latter are now easily available in India. Instruments
that can be taken apart must be disassembled prior to washing.
Formaldehyde
has a broad spectrum of action on microorganisms. A number
of studies have shown that with contact time of 60-180 minutes,
formaldehyde at .2% will only sanitize. Formaldehyde at
2% will disinfect.
Formaldehyde
at 2% will sterilize. Formaldehyde works best at a relative
humidity of >70%-80% and at higher temperatures, and
its activity against spores and acid fast bacilli is slow
(6). The use of Glutaraldehyde is effective, but the manufacturer's
instructions regarding pH, self life, and time for disinfection
or sterilization must be followed.
It
is worth noting that the agent causing creutzfeldtJokob
disease in resistant to sterilization by boiling, ultraviolet
irradiation, ionizing radiation, 70% ethanol plus formaldehyde
vapour, glutaraldehyde, 4% formaldehyde (10% formalin, as
used to preserve pathologic specimens) and Ethylene Oxide.
REFERENCES
-
Residual organic debris on processed surgical instruments,
DesCoteaux JG, Poulin EC, Julien M; Guidoin R' AORN J,
1995 Jul,62:1,23-30
-
Levels
of microbial contamination on surgical instruments. Rutala
WA; Gergen Mf; Jones JF; Weber DJ;AMJ infect control;
AMJ infect Control 1998 Ape, 26:2, 143-5.
-
Gas
and steam sterilization of assembled versus disassembled
laparoscopic equipment. Microbiologic studies. marshburn
PB; Rutala WA;Wannamaker NS; Hulka JF; J Reprod Med, 1991
Jul, 36:7, 483-7
-
From
Hospital Infections Program, National Centre for Infectious
disease, Centers for disease control and prevention Atlanta,
GA.
-
Protecting
Patients, personnel, instruments in the OR. Crow S; AORN
J, 1993 Oct, 58:4, 771-4
-
Park's
Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 14th Ed.,
1995, M/s. Banarasidas Bhanot, Publishers, 1167 Prem Nagar
Jabalpur.
|