  |
|
|
About
Us
|
Membership
|
Members'
Directory
|
Conferences
|
Articles

|
Contact
Us
|
|
SPHINCTER
SAVING RADICAL RESECTIONS :
History:
|
Attempts on
saving sphincter following resection for rectal cancer date back
to Verneuil in 1873 and Kraske in 1885. Miles (1908) described the
technique of abdominoperineal resection on the basis of describing
the lymphatic spread in upward, lateral and downward direction.
His view dominated for three decades Goligher in 1951 showed that
there is no distal spread of the lymphatics that questioned the
dominance of APR.
Sphincter preservation was through over and initially lesions upper
third of rectum and rectosigmoid were operated by Sphincter preserving
surgery, d'Allaines in 1956 introduced abdominosacral approach for
resection. Dixon 1958 introduced the modern anterior resection.
With time, sphincter preserving opera-tions were extended to cancers
below the rectosigmoid and upper half of the rectum and with advent
of circular stapling devices, sphincter preserving operations become
possible for most cancers of the mid rectum. In 1970s with the introduction
of coloanal anastomosis by Sir Aian Parks, most of the lesions in
lower rectum were also subjected to sphincter preservation.
Changing Concepts for Sphincter Preservation : In adults, the rectum
is about 15 cm long. For treatment purposes the rectum is divided
into three seg-ments e.g. upper, middle and lower one third at 5
cm intervals from anal verge. Initially it was believed that at
least 6-8 cm. of residual anorectum was needed for continence to
be preserved and a distal resection margin of 5 cm was thought to
be minimum. This concept led to restriction of sphincter preservation
to lesions of upper and middle third rectum. Later on It was proved
that continence could be preserved even if whole of the rectum is
resected. Margin of2cms Is enough for favorable lesions i.e. welt
differentiated node negative tumors and for poorly differentiated
node positive tumors 5 cm attempted in favorable lesions.
Mile's operation (APR) was based on the view that lymphatic drainage
of the rectum is in upward lateral and downward directions. This
view was refuted by Goligher and it is now accepted that infralevator
lymphatic drainage of rectum does not occur and thus majority of
the rectal tumors can be removed in a man-ner that preserved sphincter
complex.
During the 1980's two other advances in the technique of excision
of the rectum significantly modified the operative approaches to
rectal cancer namely total mesorectal excision (TME) and pelvic
autonomic nerve preservation (ANP). The principle of TME with ANP
is based on sharp dissection between the parietal and visceral planes
of pelvic vie fascia. The technique ensures that the complete rectum
and mesorectum are excised together with perirectal fat to achieve
negative lateral margins. This technique has reduced local recurrence
rates from the worldwide figures of thirty percent to 5-8 % .
Low Anterior Resection (LAR):
LAR is any recta} resection that requires extraperitoneal rectal
mo-bilization with an extraperitoneal colorectal or ileorectal anastomosis.
Indications:
o Lesions at middle one third (5to10 cm from anal verge).
o Lesions of lower one third (0 to 5 cm from anal verge) are technically
difficult but managed by stapled anastamosis.
Contraindications:
o Tumors located 4 cm or below from anal verge.
o Extremely bulky tumors.
o Fixation of tumorto pelvic wall.
o Obese men/women with narrow pelvis having low or mid rectal lesion.
o Medically incapacitated patient.
o Preoperative gross fecal incontinence is absolute contraindication
for anterior resection.
o Any spread of tumor to the sphincter complex.
o Distant metastasis.
ANASTMOTIC TECH-NIQUES :
Suture Techniques :
Anastomosis can be done by single layer interrupted 4-0 polyglycolic
acid or silk sutures. Posterior row sutures placed first. This can
be accomplished In an end to end or end to side fash-ion where the
end of colon should be closed with su-tures.
Stapling Techniques :
Stapling can be done by a singale staple technique using Circular
Stapler (EEA by Auto Suture or CDH by Ethicon). After firing the
stapler completeness of the anastomosis should be checked by examining
the doughnuts of the proximal and distal margins. Alternatively
a double staple technique can be used wherein prior to division
of distal rectum, a TA-55/ Roticulator Stapler is fired beyond the
lesion. Rectum is divided proximal to the stapler line and specimen
is removed. Then a circular intraluminal stapler is applied to complete
the anastomosis through the distal rectal staple line.
Abdominosacral resec-tion :
d'Allaines popularized this procedure. Patients with midrectal lesions
5-10 cms from anal verge are candidates for abdominosacral resection.
Abdomen is opened through oblique incision starting between left
costal margin and the iliac crest, running parallel to inguinal
ligament and curving across the rectus above the pubis. Left colon
and rectum are mobilized through this incision. A transverse incision
is made over the sacrococcygeal Joint, coc-cyx is disarticulated
and excised opening is enlarged by bulk dissection and rectosigmoid
stump is delivered through this wound. The lesion is excised and
a single layered sutured / stapled anastomosis is done to restore
the bowel continuity. Both the abdominal and sacral wounds are closed
in layers.
Colo-anal Procedures:
The abdominal anal pull through technique was the first attempt
at coloanal anastomosis but unreliable functional result prevented
the routine use of this technique. In 1972 Parks described the endo-analcolo-anal
anastomosis as a method of avoiding damage to the anal sphincter
mechanism. Postoperative assessment at 12 to 18 months showed that
nearly all patients achieved continence to solid stool, but control
of liquid stool or flatus was variable.
There are two methods for colo-anal anastomosis-straight and colonic
J'pouch anastomosis. Functional results following -straight colo-anal
anastomosis are often disappointing because many patients suffer
from bowel fre-quency, soiling even after a year of adaptation.
The limitations of the straight colo-anal anasto-mosis led to the
development of the colonic J'pouch anastomosis (Lazorthes 1986).
The colonic J'pouch is made by folding the colon and creating a
side to side anastomosis with a linear cutting stapler Introduced
through the apex of the pouch. The apex is anastomosed to the anus
endoanally or by the double stapling technique. The function with
the coIonic reservoir is better than with a straight colo-anal anastomosis.
LOCAL THERAPY:
HISTORY
Lisfranc first reported local excision of rectal carcinoma in 1826.
Initially this minimal access approach was necessary, as major colonic
resection was formidable surgical challenge. In 1885 Paul Kraske
presented the trans sacral approach, to rectal lesions, Bevan (1917)
introduced Transsphincteric approach, which was repopularised by
York Mason In 1970. Papillon first reported the use of endocavitary
irradiation in 1973. Strauss introduced electrocoagulation of rectal
cancer in 1935. Initially majority of local excision were palliative,
however, curative local excision of rectal tumor have been revived
In recent years.
PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA :
Preoperative Staging :
This is done by various in-vestigations like Digital Rectal Examination
(DRE), Ultrasonography, CTScan, MR1 and more recently by Endoscopic
Ultrasonography (EDS). Use of EUS can determine T stage of tumor
with 90%.
Selection Criteria :
Tumor < 4cm in diameter.
Tumor involves < 40% of cir-cumference.
Proximal margin < 8 cm from dentate line.
No palpable perirectal nodes.
Tumor mobile within pelvis on DRE.
Low grade tumor(Gl ,G2)
EUS determined uT1, Low risk uT2
Transanal Excision:
Under general anesthesia, in jackknife position and appropriate
exposure a full thickness excision of the bowel wall is undertaken
with care to expose perirectal fat to confirm a full thickness excision
of the bowel wall containing the tumor. Recurrence rate ob-served
by this procedure Is less than 5%.
Transcoccygeal Excision:
Under general anesthesia with the patient in prone-jackknife position
incision Is made adjacent to the sacrum and coccyx down to the upper
border of the posterior aspect of external sphincter. A posterior
proctotomy is performed and tumor is removed with 1 cm margin under
direct vision. The advantage of posterior approach is that the immediate
mesorectal tissue adjacent to the tu-mor is removed with the perirectal
nodes.
Transsphincteric Excision:
The York-Mason transsphincteric approach to the lower rectum Involves
complete division of the sphincters and the posterior wall of the
rectum. After removing the tumor, the rectum, sphincters, and musculature
are reapproximated In a care-ful stepwise fashion. Be-cause the
exposure to the lower rectum during this procedure Is similar to
that of the Kraske procedure but with an increased risk of incontinence,
there are few indications for this technique.
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM)
:
TEM is the most recent addition to the list of local excision techniques
for rec-tum and lower colon. TEM allows access from the dentate
line of the anus up to the lower sigmold colon. TEM is performed
with the use of endoscopic microsurgical resectoscope under direct
binocular vision full thickness bowel wall is excised with tumor
and closure of the defect is done by primary suturing with the use
of appropriately designed endoscopic microsurgical Instruments.
Endocavitary Irradiation:
Endocavitary Irradiation is a suitable alternative to curative surgical
excision of selected rectal cancer and may also be employed for
palliation patient medical unfit to undergo an operation.
Electrocoagulation :
Although not widely ac-cepted local treatment by electrocoagulation
is spar-ingly used. A theoretical advantage of this technique is
that it may be less likely to cause seeding of viable tumor cells.
Disadvantages being lack of pathological specimen for staging, reliance
on visual and tactile information confirming tumor eradication and
need for repeated procedures.
LASER TREATMENT :
Laser have not generally been used In curative treatment of colon
and rectal carcinomas. Laser treatment of rectal cancer is generally
limited treatment of bleeding or obstructive tumors, either for
palliation or to achieve decompression for preoperative bowel preparation.
PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY (PDT):
Recently Photodynamic Therapy has been used for palliation and local
cure of small tumors such as anastomotic recurrence or for small
residual areas of tumor after incomplete excision by other local
techniques such as laser treatment or a peranal excision.
CRYOSURGERY:
Use of Cryosurgery is lim-ited to recannalization of an obstructing
tumor in elderly medically unfit patient pre-senting with subacte/acute
obstruction as a palliative measure.
ADJUVANT THERAPY (RT+/CT) :
Use of Adjuvant Therapy i.e. radiotherapy alone or in combination
with chemo-therapy alter a sphincter saving resection is usually
Indicated In locally advanced T2, T3 tumors with positive nodal
metastases defected pathologically In the specimen to decrease the
loco regional tumor recurrence rate and Increase the disease free
survival of the patient. Adjuvant Therapy does not seem to improve
overall survival of the patient and do not have any effect on rate
of distant-metastases In various randomized trials.
INDUCTION THERAPY (R.T.+/-C.T.) :
Induction therapy refers chemotherapy, radiation therapy or both
delivered before a definitive surgical procedure to diminish the
likelihood of pelvic recurrence and to alter the magnitude and scope
of planned surgical procedure. Use of induction therapy downstages
78 to 83% of patients who are determined preoperative to need APR
to undergo sphincter preserving surgery.
|
 |
|
|